Showing posts with label blast from the past. Show all posts
Showing posts with label blast from the past. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 5, 2018

Clutched – RETRO Wordplay Wednesday™ 09/05/18


WW's big bro site logo: Blast from Your Past!
Wordplay Wednesday Goes Retro! 

I thoroughly enjoy bringing an obscure, long un-used, or confounding word to your already overloaded brains every week, but it’s time to tweak the weekly grind with a fun romp down Memory Lane.

For the whole month of September, we’ll explore words and phrases from yesteryear to play with the memories of Boomers and those holding on to 39 as long as possible. For the young’uns, it’ll probably be a humorous venture, at best.*

Every decade has its kitschy slang and funny fascination with skewed definitions, so each week we’ll explore a different decade: 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, respectively, thanks to my cousin/best friend, Ron. It was his idea and while I’d love to hog the credit, he’d say, “I knew you’d do that.” So I’m proving him wrong. 😊

Feel free to tuck these vocabulary tidbits into a corner of your mind until the next time you make it a point to visit someone who will enjoy your newfound knowledge or rekindled memory. Make it a meaningful and fun way to connect!

Tickling your tranny from the Fabulous Fifties … since Ron is a classic car buff, we’re revving up this week’s retro word knowledge with …

CLUTCHED (kluch -ed) vi. – Rejected. [WW/RETRO-1 #180]
            Dictionary definition, in short: 1) to snatch or seize (at); 2) to engage the clutch of an automobile, etc.

Yup. When guys chatted in their bravado manner, common waaaaay back in the 1950s (think Grease, West Side Story, and The Godfather), they often used vehicle metaphors.

Now, we could hypothesize that they knew they were creating slang for a “real” word like discarded, disdained, or spurned; but if girls were around, using a car term also served to keep them from eavesdropping. Cars …engines … tires and clutches … grease … ewwww! We weren’t listening.

So poor jilted John boasted to Frank, “Yeah, man, at least I got to second base before I spent too much dough on her, and she clutched.” Granted, still not perfect grammar, but then car talk often isn’t. (Don’t get huffy guys—girl talk nearly always isn’t! Like, for sure!)

What’s interesting though, is the number of words that suffered twisted definitions or slid into slang, in the 1950s through the 1970s especially, that are still in use today. This is just one list that you can peruse and pick up a whole new language for your next retro “bash.”

Do you have a “blast” when you’re having fun? Is your new car really “cool”? Whatever your age, I’m sure you’re “tight” with someone who will appreciate your hip “jets” (smarts, brains).

From Mel’s Drive-In to the 1956 Ford Thunderbird, hope you have a mah-velous stroll down Memory Lane!

Word Challenge: CLUTCHED.  It’s easy to ridicule a generation for their outdated slang and “old” ways; but remember two important dynamics: intertwined with faded jargon is age-transcending wisdom, and; *2) treat every age with tolerance, as you will be there someday too. Food for thought, as you fit clutched into your week of vintage writings.

Learning knows no prejudices or boundaries, and it isn’t fattening! Expanding your mind is a no-cost, simple joy. Do you feel that way too? What’s your inspiration? Share your creative genius and Wordplay Wednesday comments below.

Write first for yourself … only then can you write for others. (L.Rochelle) 

                       


LinDee Rochelle is a writer and editor by trade, and an author by way of Rock & Roll. She has published two books (of three) in her Blast from Your Past series, available on Amazon (eBook and print): Book 1Rock & Roll Radio DJs: The First Five Years 1954-1959; and Book 2Rock & Roll Radio DJs: The Swinging Sixties. Coming soon, … The Psychedelic Seventies!

E-N-Dzzzzzzzz

Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Wordplay Wednesday™ June 28, 2017 – Abulia



I Don’t Know … What Do You Think? 

Ah yes, when the San Diego County Fair is in town, I lose all sense of reason and anything resembling work is shoved to the side. That leaves me in a state of … 

ABULIA (ɘ bōōʹlē ɘ; Psychology) n. – loss of the ability to exercise willpower and make decisions (adj. abulic) [WW #118] 

Beyond that is, deciding which day (or two) to attend the Fair! Which in my case, includes Thursday, June 29th when Jay & The Americans will Rock us back to the 1960s & ‘70s! The only band to make an appearance in both my books: Blast from Your Past! Book 1 – Rock & Roll Radio DJs: The First Five Years 1954-1959, and Book 2 – R&R Radio DJs: The Swinging Sixties!

My bout of abulia will abate by the first week of July. However, I did ignore it long enough to give you another word to mull over in your own state of abulia.

Don’t fight it … give in and put aside the challenge of daily decisions to peruse the benefits of periodic abulia. Like all things that should be experienced in moderation, consider the optimum place and time.to indulge.

Word Challenge: ABULIA. Timing is everything. At the right time and place, fit abulia into your week of self-controlled writings.

Write first for yourself … only then can you write for others. (L.Rochelle) 

                        

# # #

Wednesday, April 12, 2017

Wordplay Wednesday™ April 12, 2017 – Puissant



Anatomy of Book Reviews – It’s All in the Stars 

Are you an avid Amazon book reviewer? Do you love reading a book, sharing your thoughts in a review—and bestowing it your 1 (rotten tomato) to 5 (GOLD*) stars?

Author to Reader—do you know how to write a review that makes you look good, informs prospective readers, and gives the author an honest critique?

Amazon author rankings are enigmatic at best and confidence-destroying at worst. Unfortunately, many readers who review and wield their star-power arbitrarily, know not what they do …

PUISSANT (pwisʹɘnt; pyooʹi sɘnt) adj. – powerful; strong; n. puissance  [WW #107]

In a book or product review, or even life, power without substance is false positive.

Today’s puissant word is prompted by a nice 4-star review received on Amazon, for my latest book. 4 and 5 stars are always appreciated. You hear a “but” coming, though, right?

But … it’s time to address those delightful readers who mean well, while not truly understanding what their reviews and star gradings actually do to or for, an author—much less for other readers, for whom they should be writing. (This article refers to real people/reviewers; see Forbes article about fake reviews.)

I appreciate each and every review; yes, even the antagonistic ones. All are puissant in their own way. I learn from the negative as much as I stroke my ego reading the glowing reviews. Not all reviews are created equal …

When reviewing, do you consider too, the book and author you’re writing about? To a puissant and voluminous author (you know, the Stephen Kings* of the world), one review does not carry as much weight and affect rankings like a book with, say, less than twenty-five reviews. (*King averages 2,000+.)  So …

A review with less than 5 stars, while perhaps admiring in content, creates a quandary for prospective readers and frustrates the book’s ranking.

Although the reader obviously liked my book, he didn’t actually review it. It’s wonderful he felt urged to take a fun trek down Memory Lane—the true objective of the Blast from Your Past! books.

His comments broke down to about 80% his DJ history/memories (and I’m OK with that), 15% making nice about my book (so glad he’s looking forward to the next one!), but only 5% worth for other readers. More importantly, he did not tell us why he gave the book only 4 STARS.

It’s all in the puissant stars … FYI, there is little negative difference in author rankings between 4 stars and 1. There is a HUGE drop in rankings, though, when we receive 4 stars rather 5. And Amazon’s algorithms pick up on the negatives …

And it’s compounded if there is no explanation from the reviewer as to why less than 5. Without a reason, the review is a disservice to prospective readers, and reduces the book’s visibility. If you have NOTHING negative to say about the book, then for heaven’s sake, award it 5 stars!

Just threw this in to see if you're still reading 😉
So dear readers, be truly puissant in your reviews, whether for Amazon or other public venue. Grade books and other products authoritatively.

Tips: Always state reasons for your opinion and comments. Does it warrant a negative? Then try “constructive criticism.” Bottom line—why did you hate it—or why did you LOVE it?

To other authors: remember, you can’t please all the readers all the time. Be confident in your writing and appreciate the negatives, while you cherish the puissant positives.  
*Note to Amazon: the stars should be in a rainbow of colors to reflect our true opinion: 1=red (hated it); 2=pink (some redeeming value); 3=blue (just OK); 4=purple (good, could be better); 5=Gold (excellent!).

Word Challenge: PUISSANT. Make your book and product reviews puissant! Guide others who peruse them, and offer commendable insight, as you fit puissant into your week of thoughtful writings.

Write first for yourself … only then can you write for others. (L.Rochelle)


                       

# # #